Climate change
Truths and myths
03/02/10 05:10
In previous blogs, J33PER has made it quite clear on which side of the fence he's on. Now what was the big argument about? Note: was.
The actual argument as far as I'm concerned is about the manipulation that goes on by governments and groups with huge self interests. This kind of manipulation often goes undetected and the world population follows like sheep. People able to think for themselves have exposed these characters and finally, anthropogenic global warming can be written off as one of the biggest scams that nearly had us all fooled!
You still think that J33PER is a luddite? Read this....
So, is it now OK to burn as much fossil fuel as we like? Do we need to care about emissions? Does it make sense to produce fuel efficient motorcars? Of course it does and let's do our best to reduce, reuse and recycle!
The actual argument as far as I'm concerned is about the manipulation that goes on by governments and groups with huge self interests. This kind of manipulation often goes undetected and the world population follows like sheep. People able to think for themselves have exposed these characters and finally, anthropogenic global warming can be written off as one of the biggest scams that nearly had us all fooled!
You still think that J33PER is a luddite? Read this....
So, is it now OK to burn as much fossil fuel as we like? Do we need to care about emissions? Does it make sense to produce fuel efficient motorcars? Of course it does and let's do our best to reduce, reuse and recycle!
0 Comments
Question on zero emmission...
10/12/09 06:54
If the power station that produces the electricity that runs my car is powered by fossil fuel, can I still maintain that my car has zero emissions?
"Is J33PER becoming less Climate Change skeptical" I hear you ask. No, he's not!
The reason for raising this question is that I am more than happy to contribute to whatever is best for our environment.. as long as "the solution" has substance, is consistent and isn't merely a fad thought out by some vote chasing politician.
If I buy a new car that has 20% lower emissions than my old one, am I doing the environment a favour? Is it OK to forget about the CO2 foot print of actually producing the thing?
Now, throughout this Climate debate, I still haven't heard and answers to these questions. Answers on a postcard please!
"Is J33PER becoming less Climate Change skeptical" I hear you ask. No, he's not!
The reason for raising this question is that I am more than happy to contribute to whatever is best for our environment.. as long as "the solution" has substance, is consistent and isn't merely a fad thought out by some vote chasing politician.
If I buy a new car that has 20% lower emissions than my old one, am I doing the environment a favour? Is it OK to forget about the CO2 foot print of actually producing the thing?
Now, throughout this Climate debate, I still haven't heard and answers to these questions. Answers on a postcard please!
Climate Change and blasphemy
08/12/09 07:02
Climate change and blasphemy...
Doubting the general consensus that is Climate Change is seen as blasphemy and that I find worrying. We are all overwhelmed by the one view peddled by the media including the BBC. Even the prime minister of the UK calls non believers "flat earthers". I have taken exception to that. This has made me even more determined to question the whole notion that human kind is directly responsible through CO2 emissions for a catastrophic change in the climate.
I am merely questioning what is being said and am unwilling to be politically correct by simply accepting what the Bilderberg Group would want us to believe.
There is ample of material out there on the Internet to gain an insight of the opposing views. I particularly like what Lord Monckton has to say on the subject even if I don't agree with views he has on other subjects. Nigel Lawson is another person who is asking some pertinent questions on the subject and who refuses to take what is being peddled as gospel.
More to come on Climate Change soon..
Doubting the general consensus that is Climate Change is seen as blasphemy and that I find worrying. We are all overwhelmed by the one view peddled by the media including the BBC. Even the prime minister of the UK calls non believers "flat earthers". I have taken exception to that. This has made me even more determined to question the whole notion that human kind is directly responsible through CO2 emissions for a catastrophic change in the climate.
I am merely questioning what is being said and am unwilling to be politically correct by simply accepting what the Bilderberg Group would want us to believe.
There is ample of material out there on the Internet to gain an insight of the opposing views. I particularly like what Lord Monckton has to say on the subject even if I don't agree with views he has on other subjects. Nigel Lawson is another person who is asking some pertinent questions on the subject and who refuses to take what is being peddled as gospel.
More to come on Climate Change soon..
